But Karua, the Narc Kenya presidential, was visiting the Pumwani Maternity Hospital. She not only gave a statement on the on-going strike by doctors, but also cleared the fees for some mothers.
Definitely, it can be argued that this was a calculated public relations stunt and the Kenyan media houses did not fall for that trap. But nevertheless, how can this noble act be relegated to a mere by-the way-mention, ensconced in a round-up of other 'weightier' political stories of the day?
I am not trying to agitate for fair coverage on behalf of the Karua campaign team. I am just pointing out my misgivings about how the local media is inadvertently propping up certain politicians, at the expense of others, on a not so objective platform.
It would be a different matter if, say a media house is to declare their support or endorsement of a particular presidential aspirant, and then proceed to give him or her coverage ad nauseam.
But it is foolhardy to do the same, while pretending to be non-affiliated to any political party, and still expect Kenyans not to see through the media charade.
2 comments:
Poor Martha I empathize with her.Imagine Wiper party had to be featured in yesterday's news bulletins despite Kalonzo being out of country (in Doha or something).Take heart Martha at least you are being highlighted on opinion polls without a mention. Peri
The media in Kenya is biased. Its hard to tell when they are objective. I am tempted to think people like Ole Kiyiapi quit the race. I think everyone is entitled to fair coverage by the press.
Post a Comment