Reliable and credible news ought to be anchored on solid facts. And the press simply should not convey information. Value addition through interpretative or analytical processing is the now the accepted standard. But if this is not carefully done, the audience may end up being served with frogs, half baked facts, marinated fallacies and steamed fake news.
Whereas the screaming headline above grabs deep attention by suggesting hundreds of thousands of young people are not interested in getting their college education funded by the Kenyan government, it could be quite shallow in substance.
The state, would most likely finance the studies of students enrolling in either degree, diploma or certificate courses.
Out of the over 600,000 who sat for the 2017 secondary school leaving exam:
- slightly over 69,000 attained grade C+ and above, the minimum university entry requirement
- about 100,000 got between grade C and C- , and these qualify for diploma and certificate courses.
- while over 350, 000 candidates scored between D and E, that makes them eligible for mostly craftsmanship and artisan courses.
This would be a good place to start looking for the 'rumoured' 500,000 who supposedly 'snubbed free college education'.
And while at it, bear in mind that the entire annual capacity for state-sponsored degree, diploma and certificate courses can only accommodate about 210,000 students.
Incidentally, not everybody who applied for financing from the Higher Education Loans Board in the past has been getting it, or the entire amount required, so it will take a lot of convincing to believe that the government is in a position to fund post-secondary education for all the 2017 candidates.
The state, most likely, would realistically be more worried by the nearly 6,000 qualified candidates who failed to secure university placement this year, due to inadequate cluster subject scores for their chosen courses, or the fact that they did not apply at all.
The fixation by a section of the local media with the figure of 500,000, is apparently then not as warranted, as the picture being painted.
Now what is left is the small matter of frogs.
Anyone out there who can croak a believable explanation?
An uncompromising critique of how the media covers topical issues, challenging traditional journalism concepts and charting fresh interpretations of news.
If you feel a news story does not measure up to expected journalistic standards, bring it to the Journalism Dry Cleaner. Through our collective wisdom, we will strip it of all offensive dirt.
REAL TIME VISITORS
BLOG GUESTS
Showing posts with label Kenya Higher Education. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Kenya Higher Education. Show all posts
Thursday, 12 April 2018
Friday, 3 November 2017
HIGHER EDUCATION AND MEDIA AS PURVEYOR OF IGNORANCE
A primary reason for tuning into a news channel is to be informed of significant happenings. But the content in Kenyan broadcasting stations can try one's patience. The delivery and presentation too, can be grossly abhorrent. Local TV news gets particularly revolting, if it becomes a purveyor of ignorance, in coverage of higher education matters.
Let's first take a few moments to frown upon the blatant disregard of elementary English language etiquette above, masquerading as an innocuous typo.
There are 'more serious' issues at stake here.
How the graphics below got to get on air in their sorry state, should be a big worry to the channel's media managers.
If the on screen information is to be believed:
- An Assistant Lecturer, at some undefined point in time, used to earn more than a Lecturer.
- The same Assistant Lecturer now earns a substantially lower amount in a new pay structure, as compared to the previous rate.
Now that's negative progress, but I digress.
This kind of ignorance is not bliss, it makes the heart miss a beat or two.
Let's first take a few moments to frown upon the blatant disregard of elementary English language etiquette above, masquerading as an innocuous typo.
There are 'more serious' issues at stake here.
How the graphics below got to get on air in their sorry state, should be a big worry to the channel's media managers.
If the on screen information is to be believed:
- An Assistant Lecturer, at some undefined point in time, used to earn more than a Lecturer.
- The same Assistant Lecturer now earns a substantially lower amount in a new pay structure, as compared to the previous rate.
Now that's negative progress, but I digress.
This kind of ignorance is not bliss, it makes the heart miss a beat or two.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
